Jehovah Witness believe Jesus did not have long hair because it was shameful and a sin for men to have long hair in those times and were killed if seen like that in public. They also believe Jesus was nailed to a single wooden pole and not a cross because evidence shows only single poles have been discovered, and no crosses have. Is this technically correct, or is there new evidence that proves otherwise?
from Yahoo Answers: Latest Questions https://ift.tt/2MWS57t
Post Top Ad
Responsive Ads Here
Thursday, September 5, 2019
Home
yahoo Answer
Yahoo Answers: Latest Questions
[ Religion & Spirituality ] Open Question : Are Jehovah Witness correct when they say Jesus did not have long hair and was crussified on a single wooden pole instead of a cross?
[ Religion & Spirituality ] Open Question : Are Jehovah Witness correct when they say Jesus did not have long hair and was crussified on a single wooden pole instead of a cross?
Tags
# yahoo Answer
# Yahoo Answers: Latest Questions
About Theworldtimesnow
Yahoo Answers: Latest Questions
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Post Top Ad
Responsive Ads Here
No comments:
Post a Comment